If Donald Trump was to become President of Russia, what would he keep and what would he change?

Response:

It’s interesting to consider the hypothetical scenario of Donald Trump as President of Russia. Below are some points that might reflect what he could potentially keep or change based on his past policies and statements:

What He Might Keep:

1. Strong Leadership Image:

• Trump is known for valuing a strong, commanding presence in leadership, which aligns with Vladimir Putin’s style. He might maintain a similar image to consolidate power.

1. Nationalism:

• A focus on nationalism and prioritizing Russian interests could resonate with Trump’s “America First” policies, promoting Russian sovereignty and pride.

1. Military Strength:

• Maintaining a strong military presence and emphasizing national defense would likely be a priority, similar to Trump’s advocacy for military funding and readiness in the U.S.

1. Populist Rhetoric:

• Using populist language to connect with the common citizen and build support against elites and foreign influences might be a staple.

What He Might Change:

1. Foreign Relations:

• Trump could shift Russia’s approach to the West, potentially seeking to renegotiate relationships with countries such as the U.S. or NATO, focusing on cooperation instead of confrontation.

1. Economic Policies:

• He might push for economic reforms aimed at boosting entrepreneurship and reducing reliance on state-run enterprises, drawing from his business acumen.

1. Media Control:

• Trump might adopt a more decentralized media landscape, potentially introducing more media freedom while also battling perceived “fake news” outlets.

1. Domestic Policies:

• A focus on improving relations with various ethnic groups within Russia and addressing internal divisions could be areas of change, aligning with his often populist domestic initiatives.

1. Energy Strategy:

• Though Russia is a major energy exporter, Trump might explore diversifying the economy away from heavy reliance on oil and gas sectors, emphasizing alternatives and innovations.

Conclusion

This scenario depends greatly on both external and internal pressures and reactions from the global community and Russian citizens. It’s a speculative exercise, as actual governance styles can vary significantly from campaign promises or personal ideologies.