VIGNETTES SERIES 7 : Vignettes 23 – 25


Vignettes 23 – 25



Children appreciate classroom routines and organisation. Although young they like predictability. From experience I don’t believe young people despair of repetition but value ‘links’ with the day that routines reinforce. They like things to be predictable because that offers reassurance and extends feelings of security. Many children come from environments that are not always predictable. A settled, predictable school program where children know what is happening and what is coming next builds both confidence and trust.

Students who were part of my schools from years ago and with whom I have had contact years later, have told me how big and scary school was when they were little. Those who have come back to visit the schools of which they were student members talk about how little the school seems compared to what it was when they were in their primary, especially early primary years. An object lesson I learned from these disclosures was that children appreciated the security they were offered at school.

There are times when programs need to vary and when general routines and timetabled programs have to be set aside. If possible, we should avoid springing these changes on children ‘out of the blue’. It is important that teachers give as much notice as possible to children about changes and why they are being made. This can sometimes be done through forward notification to parents via newsletter or online contact. Letting children know beforehand is helped if school leaders give lead notice to teachers about changes.

Routines will be helped if children understand the following:

* What subjects happen on what days.
* Routines marking the beginning and end of each school day.
* Recess and lunchtime procedures including play areas.
* Understanding the times each day for maths, language and other subjects.
* Being clear about the days the class may have specialist teachers for subjects.
* Knowing what is where in the classroom, unit and school.
* Understanding the school facilities and knowing the school map.
* The names of teachers school support staff.
* Rules that are in place to make the classroom, unit and school safe.
* The names of and a little background about relief staff.
* Their right to be protected and feel safe at school.

There are many other factors that build into school routines, the above being a sample of what might be relevant.

Routines and procedures are important. Without them, children can become aimless, confused and lost within what should be the safe, supportive environment of school.



Sometimes teachers get into a bind about how they should be addressed by children and students. Some believe that in order to encourage relationships, that first names are fine.

Under no circumstances would I endorse this approach. Teachers are adults, students in primary and secondary schools in a learning relationship under their guidance. Respectful address demands that teachers are addressed as Mr, Mrs, Miss or Ms.

Surnames can be hard to pronounce. Teachers with difficult or indecipherable surnames often ask students to use their christian names instead. If this is done I’d strongly suggest the Christian name be preceded by Mr, Mrs, Miss or Ms. Another method might be to have children use the first letter hard to pronounce your surname. In that case it would be Mr M, Ms S and so on.

Students in secondary schools tend to refer to teachers is “Sir”, “Miss”, or “Ms”. That may be a preference but personally I would recommend the use of names as outlined above.

Appropriate address of teachers by students helps when it comes to the establishment of a respectful relationship. Similarly, those relationships are in hands if teachers take the time and make the effort to learn and use student names when speaking to their learning clientele.



Interviews between parents/carers and teachers about children is one of the most important ways of keeping in touch with progress being made. It’s important that teachers and parents are on the same wavelength regarding student progress.

In many schools interviews are organised toward the end of term one and term three. This allows teachers to let parents and carers know how students are progressing to a particular point in time during the school year. These conversations also help to prepare the way for written reports that follow, usually at the end of term two and term four.

While these interviews are usually brief (around 10 to 15 minutes) they are a way of ensuring some contact regularity about teaching and learning.

At times, longer interviews dealing with more specific issues are necessary. I believe that interviews to deal with specific topics or being called for particular reasons need to be programmed. Arranging by phone or note for parents to come in as a mutually convenient time the best way to go. Similarly if parents ring requesting interviews the same should apply. It’s best for interviews to happen in privacy and after school hours.

Some parents will approach teachers at the start of this school day to deal with an issue “there and then”. This isn’t fair on to the teacher or the class. Interviews conducted audibly in front of children places teachers in a bad situation. These conversations can be quite embarrassing. When this happens and teachers are confronted, I believe it appropriate to “call time” on the conversation there and then and arrange for a mutually convenient time when the conversation can be pursued.

If the teacher is unsure how an interview will progress or if she/he feels undue pressure, it is advisable to ask for a senior to be present during the meeting. If the teacher feels comfortable about an interview and doesn’t need that support, to be under the gaze of others as the interview is progressing can be helpful. The venue may be an interview room, a classroom that is visible to others, or similar environment in which the conversation takes place.

A strong suggestion is the teachers take notes for their own personal records of interviews that take place. It is a good idea to spend time post the meeting to write these notes up in some detail. Notes can record positives along with matters being dealt with the more challenging context.

When interviews happen “off-the-cuff and the spirit of the moment” teachers are caught unprepared. They may also be dealing with parents or carers who are somewhat agitated and even hostile. To set a future interview time gives everybody the opportunity to prepare and to come into the conversation in a rational way.

When teachers catch students doing something good and want to offer praise, sharing that praise with parents and carers can help. That might be done through a phone call or a simple brief message of congratulations of the parents coming to the school. This policy offers a sense of balance about reasons why contact is made with parents and carers. Conversations do not have to be totally about poor attitudes or behaviour.

For students to be made aware of interviews taking place between parents and teachers can be wise. That can be done in a positive way. I think it hard on students when adults have conversations about students without students knowing or understanding why the interview is happening. Students are very imaginative and may have all sorts of things on their minds about matters. Misinterpretation needs to be avoided. Children need to know that meetings of this nature are about helping them overcome issues and grow in terms of both character and accomplishment.

1 thought on “VIGNETTES SERIES 7 : Vignettes 23 – 25

  1. Dear Henry,
    I read with interest each article you contribute that comes my way, usually via my mother Kath Meyering who you may remember. My mum would drive in from Noonamah to school to listen to the reading of students in my 2/3 Class back in 2007/8, she very much enjoyed her experience at Leanyer and is a great fan of yours and while living in Perth posted your articles to me from time to time.
    I have come across system problem within recruitment that is interfering with my ability to be employed as a relief teacher in the NT and it is basically this; although I am a registered teacher in the NT, have my ochre card, criminal history not a problem the powers that be will not let me teach without a reference from a principal or assistant principal that is greater than 2 years since my last teaching experience.
    In 2014 I was relief teaching in 4 schools in the second half of the year my contact with the principals was minimal as is understandably the case and although I had more contact with the AP’s they are hardly in a position to give me a reference upon such limited acquaintance.
    I am rather at my wits end trying to get through the impenetrable screen of departmental hoo haa and finding anyone to help me who has a modicum of common sense.
    I know it has been years and years since we have had any sort of converse Henry but you have always been the voice of reason for me in the dark night that has beset our education system.
    I was reading one of your more recent articles that my mother had saved for me to read (she knows how I feel about the institutionalisation of our children from such an early age) and she said “Louise, why don’t you contact Mr Gray, he might be able to give you some advice or assistance that will allow you to resolve this obstacle to your teaching”. Well dear Henry whist I am long past the age of hiding behind my mother’s skirts I appreciate her wisdom, these are more or less the words she said to me, probably less for she had much to say on the issue. As a result I have ‘listened to my mother’ and here I am composing this rather long monologue as a result of it..
    The questions that I have are you able to assist me to find a way through the HR maze that is our education department and if you are would you feel kindly enough towards me to do so.
    I appreciate my message/request to you has come from way out of left field and will not think any the less of you if you are unable to be of assistance.
    Sincerely yours
    (and a great dose of affection as well towards you great singing:) and for all those yard duties you covered for us teachers to give us a break, not to mention the fish and chips for morning tea)

    Louise Lazar-Wright

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.