STUDENTS CAN BE STRONG EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS

Students are an integral and essential part of schooling. They are the focus of what education should be about. This is often overlooked. Too often we talk of, and about, students. Frequently this conversation takes place between teachers. Sometimes parents are involved. Rarely are primary school students included in negotiations that focus on their school and schooling.

In a modern educational context, it is inappropriate to overlook or ignore student input into school leadership and management issues. Equally, and at primary school level, it may be overly ambitious to suggest that students should be elected to positions on school councils.

Price (1991:84) reminds educators that ‘the world in which students of today live and are educated is vastly different from that in which their parents and teachers lived when they attended school. Schools have an undeniable responsibility to develop in students the skills, knowledge and attitudes which will prepare them to be critically aware participants in the world’.

An element of critical awareness is that of developing in young people the decision-making and leadership skills they will need as adults.

Student empowerment
Maurice Balson makes some relevant points on the issue of student empowerment. He states that traditionally autocratic society reflected in schools of yesteryear, has been replaced by a democratic social system, with an emphasis on social equality (1992: 1-3). He wrote that while there ‘is no suggestion that students are as wise, experienced or knowledgeable as their teachers . . . they do have a right to self-determination’ (op cit: 3).
He added that relationships challenges within schools are accentuated ‘because teachers are not skilled in democratic relationships’ (op cit: 7).

If respect for students is shown, then their commitment to the school will be enhanced. With staff and parents, they can join the school community partnership. A partnership exclusive of students may be tantamount to deliberate deprivation. Student frustration may be the result and the school and its parent community could be disadvantaged.

Student participation in schools
Roger Holdsworth is known as a leader in the field of student participation in schools. He maintains that:’students have a right to participate in decisions that affect their lives . . . student participation leads to more effective decision-making and learning: better decisions are made when participants share in making those decisions. Student participation provides challenges for schools. The active participation of students can be reflected in the organisational structure and health of the school . . . [engaging] students in real initiatives with productive outcomes’ (1995: pp.2, 3).

Involving students in their own education should be a paramount consideration. Allowing and encouraging students to participate in direction setting confirms the importance children as participants in decision making. Caring, sharing, problem solving and celebration then become mutually inclusive experiences.

Primary students have a lot to offer
It is not good enough that teachers and parents make decisions for students: we ought to take decisions with students. Doing things better should involve all parties as partners. To deny meaningful participative access to students is to lock out the lateral and creative thinking students bring to consideration of issues.

Do adults always know best?
‘Adults know best’ is not a wise statement. It presupposes that age equates to wisdom. What it really infers is the inability and ineligibility of young people to participate in school governance. That’s illegitimate, in my view – it’s a denial of equal opportunity and ignores basic human rights.

No need to be frightened of including children
‘Student participation would, or should, build on the present two-dimensional partnership between schools and their parent communities. A new paradigm widens or redraws frameworks but rarely demolishes what existed before; it simply incorporates those elements into a more embracing perceptual frame’ (Beare and Slaughter 1993:73).
This precept goes to the heart of collaborative leadership and shared decision-making. It is inclusive of input from all parties with a stake in educational outcomes.

Dysfunctional consequences
It can enhance functions and outcomes deriving from organisational process and structure. Denying a group with legitimate claim from entering decision-making partnerships can have dysfunctional consequences.

Partnerships need to be the outcome of genuine, honest and sincere relationships. No party to shared leadership and participative decision- making should be offered inclusion for tokenistic reasons. To Beare ‘the school can be thought of as a company of learners. If that is literally so, then those who want to learn (or their authorised agents) literally own and control the school’ (op cit: 211). In this context, a student representative council would, or should, act for all students in the same way as an elected parent council acts for the wider parent community.’

‘Children . . . are thinking, rational individuals’ (James & Prout, 1990 in Pollard and Tann, 1994:32)

Don’t underestimate children’s potential
We tend to underestimate the potential children have, their ability to think, rationalise, synthesise information and develop an action plan in relation to projects and initiatives. These words from children encapsulate the capacity, too often unrealised, they have to contribute.

‘When we think about what living in a democracy means to us, we realise how important it is that we grow up in an atmosphere where we learn to express our views and listen to those of others.

To be a good citizen is to understand that we can share in making decisions, that we want to work with others in decision-making, and that we are all valuable in making and implementing decisions’ (LaTrobe District Junior Council Network, 1996: 6).

A student council growing up: Karama Primary School, 1987 to 1991
Karama School students came from a middle and lower class socioeconomic background. Over 60% of school students were from ethnic backgrounds, many having migrated to Australia with their parents.

Notwithstanding differences between Karama and Nhulunbuy (a town on the Northern Territory, Australia), the concept of student involvement in school partnerships easily transferred to, and was readily understood by, the Karama School community. The school community, in both adult and student domains, accepted the concept of management through partnership.

It was both challenging and rewarding to work with broad visioned, creative and confident student leaders. They most ably represented the student body. Their capacity to identify problems, focus on the issues and develop solutions was enlightening to older minds. Students worked to make Karama School ‘their school’. Corporate pride and collective ownership became a trademark that evolved and developed during, and beyond, my tenure as Karama’s school principal. With that development came articulate, considered, confident, vibrant and student-focused leadership.

Operational charter
Two student councillors from Karama School, Mark Clifton (now an electrical tradesman) and Alex Smith (a tertiary education student) drew up an excellent guide to Student Council responsibilities. They determined with their council cohort that the SRC should accept responsibility in the following areas:

helping make school rules
meeting visitors to the school
answering the phones at recess and lunch time
helping run school assemblies
raising money for charities and school improvements
Many other important things.
Mark Clifton and Alex Smith stated: ‘boys and girls who are elected have an important job to do . . . they must be the best of our students’.

The following were seen as essential qualities in youthful leaders by young people themselves:

honesty and trustworthiness
friendliness and helpfulness
good manners and clear speech
good standard of school dress, usually school uniform
fairness to all
preparedness to assist younger children
pride in the school
a willingness to give some of his or her own time for SRC duties
an ability to work with other members of the SRC sensibly and productively.
Leanyer student council: ‘we’ over ‘I’
When I first arrived at Leanyer School, in Darwin, in the Northern Territory, several things perturbed me about an otherwise good school. One issue, impossible to pinpoint on the first day, had to do with student attitudes. After some months, the penny dropped. Students were, consciously and unconsciously, putting themselves ahead of their peers in importance terms. The needs of individual students seemed to be paramount.

At the time, the unspoken Leanyer ethos was ‘me first, others next’. However, once elected, the student council worked on turning student attitudes around, with students elected to the council seeing themselves as people doing things with others, and for others.

It was at Leanyer that I became convinced that student opinion and ability, in the area of problem solving and identification, is too often undervalued. This, in part, was shaped by demonstration that students who had placed ‘self’ ahead of ‘others’ in their thinking were willing to change their focus and consider the collective, both spontaneously and willingly, when an alternative organisational direction was presented and demonstrated.

My experience at Karama School demonstrated that successful schools focus on groups and the collective awareness that is a part of ‘groupship’. Leanyer students confirmed that attitude realignment was essential and could be an outcome of student council energies focusing on the ‘us’ of ‘our’ school.

How student councils can work: status and recognition
Traditionally, educational partnerships have rarely extended beyond the staff and parents of school communities. This is especially the case at the primary school level. Involving students in educational partnerships in three school communities has convinced me of the value and worth of student contribution. I suspect that many of my principal colleagues, if asked to comment, would respond that primary school student empowerment is, at best, fanciful. In other words, they see it as impractical.

‘Breaking down the barriers’ was a term coined to challenge the distance between schools and communities in the period prior to establishment of teacher and parent partnerships through school councils. Yet what was considered impossible has come to pass. Now, the same barrier is confronted when considering participation by students in an extension of the partnership model.

Danger of minimisation
There is a danger that school principals, as organisational leaders, may choose to minimise, trivialise or ‘channel and direct’ SRC function. Such ‘minimisation’ might be offering little to the SRC beyond an election, with the role of councillors meaning very little at all.

Trivialisation, that is, having a student representative council in name only, results in the withering of student interest, distrust in, and disrespect, for the principal and possibly staff. Ultimately, student attitudes become cynical and counterproductive. The manipulation of the SRC agenda, especially by exerting undue pressure on participants, is a most destructive strategy.

A concept gaining momentum
Recognition of primary school children as student councillors elected to a formally recognised representative organisation is a developing and not quite the rare concept of a few years ago. Notwithstanding, principals, staff and parents considering the concept of student representative councils would be well advised to ‘make haste slowly’.

The development of students as leaders should be a moulding process. You don’t just drop people into untried waters and expect them to instantly know how to swim. You provide chances for them to test the water and familiarise themselves with the new environment.

Learning about leadership should be an educative process, enabling students to ‘step forward with confidence’ (Grant Christie, in conversation with me on 6 January 1997).

Recommendations
I would offer the following recommendations:

that the benefits of including students in educational partnerships within primary school communities be explored
that further study be undertaken to gauge student, staff and parent interest in this extension
that student representative councils be considered as student focus groups, rather than being labelled as a student committee. This will enhance the positive connotation of such a group to staff, parents and the school community at large
that student councils be supported by empathetic adult advisory staff (principals, teachers, or both) who avoid the possibility of adult influence dominating the organisation
that any pilot program (refer recommendation four) be supported by attempts to establish reading or reference list on the subject of primary school student empowerment
that participating schools be encouraged to make contact with schools or groups piloting primary student empowerment programs elsewhere, for instance, Roger Holdsworth, coordinator of theConnect magazine, and the La Trobe Junior School Council Network
that documents explaining the purpose and function of student representative councils be prepared and circulated to all stakeholders (students, staff, parents and supporters) within the school community. Informational statements should be couched in appropriate language and provide history and background on the SRC for new families joining the school community.
that student representative council members network carefully at the start of each year, to ensure that continuing students are reminded, and new students are informed, about the Student Representative Council. This could be done by a combination of assembly presentations, class visits, small group and one-to-one discussions
that feedback on process, procedure and function be sought and considered by the Student Council, to enhance its organisational dynamic and growth
that candidates seeking election to Student Representative Councils be fully conversant with the roles and responsibilities of those elected
that both the honour and the obligation of election be elaborated to those intending to seek nomination
that those seeking, or being asked, to nominate have the chance to discuss the matter fully with their parents. This will enable parents to be fully aware of their child’s intentions. It will provide parents with a chance to discuss with their child the advisability or otherwise of seeking election on the basis of school responsibilities and extra-curricular activities
that ‘key’ days be advertised in a way that magnifies them as steps leading to SRC elections
that intending candidates have a full chance to discuss their nomination with peers and parents
that letters and information statement be sent to parents and re-visited to candidates
that candidates have the opportunity to present to their peers through speech giving (a part of the preparation should be coaching toward presentation by students of themselves and their policy platforms)
that the polling day procedures be child-focused, so students identify the day as one they ‘own’, and not one in which they participate at the behest of adults
that unsuccessful candidates be encouraged, not forgotten
that successful candidates be welcomed to the student representative council through a formal and dignified ceremony
that members of the student representative discuss who they would prefer as their advisory teachers, then contact those teachers to seek their support and involvement’
that student representative councils be elected in accordance with agreed procedure that follows on a year-by-year or period-by period basis for the sake of consistency. This will enhance the status of student representative organisation
that all students, parents, staff and members of the SRC accept and accord with a charter that encompasses the following (or similar) objectives and functions.
Expectations

honesty and trustworthiness
friendliness and helpfulness
good manners and clear speech
a good standard of dress, usually school uniform
fairness to all
preparedness to assist younger children
pride in school and community
willingness to give personal time to SRC responsibilities
ability to work productively as a focus group member
ability to represent the interests of a student collective
Objectives and responsibilities

helping to develop a school code of conduct
meeting visitors to the school
answering telephones at recess and lunch time
helping to run school assemblies
raising money for charity and school improvements
establishing quality leadership at student level
raising the profile of the school to its community and the public
Student representative councils: forums of honest intent and outcome
I am firmly convinced that student councils can ‘lead from the front’, setting appropriate and realistic goals and commitments with, and for, students. This includes discussion of educational issues and meaningful contribution to school policy. To facilitate this process, the student council must be kept informed of issues and systemic educational directions.

Within my heart I know that primary student involvement in school governance is the way to go. Nineteen years and three schools later, I am a school principal on the right track through involving students in our schools. Staff and parents have been active participants in group-focused management and direction-setting processes.

Multiplying the benefits
Student councils can work for the benefit of the school and the development of its members. Traditionalism has turned – or is turning – and there is a far more positive focus on students than there used to be. Parents, as well as their children, have to be convinced that this is the case, meaning that public relations are essential in demonstrating attitudinal change on the part of school educators.

While it is possible to show children that their input and interaction is both sought and valued, there may be some scepticism on the part of parents about the validity of this position because of their own unfortunate school experiences.

Changing the culture
Education and appeal to parents is essential if a history that distanced parents and students from teachers and principals is to be overcome. It is also essential that teachers and principals become aware of the value of student voice. Children themselves will need to be convinced about the validity of the partnership invitation. These processes take time and haste should be made slowly. The three-way partnership needs to be solidly founded and carefully built.

Student representative councils are indispensable organisations. Experience suggests that, without them, school communities would have been minus an important leadership and management dimension. I doubt that many primary school principal colleagues would share this perception so enthusiastically, but most haven’t experienced the extended shared leadership model outlined in this study. There is a lot of educating to do!

References
Ashenden, Dean and Milligan, Sandra (1993). Signposts to restructuring schools: opportunities and directions for school leaders. Canberra. National Council of Independent Schools’ Association. 
Balson, Maurice (1982). Understanding classroom behaviour, Hawthorn (Victoria). Australian Council for Educational Research Limited. 
Bates, Richard and Kynaston, Edward (eds.) (1983). Thinking aloud: interviews with Australian educators, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Beare, Hedley et al., (1991) Creating an excellent school. London. Routledge. 
Beare, H (1993). ‘Different ways of viewing school-site councils: whose paradigm is in use here?’ in Beare, H., and Lowe Boyd, W., (eds.) Restructuring schools: an international perspective on the movement to transform the control and performance of schools. Washington. Falmer Press. 
Beare, H & Lowe Boyd, W (eds.) (1993). Restructuring schools: an international perspective on the movement to transform the control and performance of schools. Washington. Falmer Press. 
Beare, Hedley and Slaughter, Richard (1993) Education for the twenty-first century. New York. Routledge. 1993. 
Benda, Danielle, ‘No going back’ in the West Australian, ‘Education Insight Supplement’, March 30, 1993. 
Blunt, Peter and Richards, David (1993). Readings in management, organisation and culture in east and south east Asia. Darwin. Northern Territory University Press. 
Boag, Charles, ‘Education Expectations in the 90s: The getting of 
Character’ in the Bulletin, Vol. 113, No. 5780. July 30, 1991, pp. 78 – 85. 
Bull, Geoff (1989). Reflective teaching using process and thinking as content. Carlton. Australian Reading Association Inc. 
Chandler, Cap, ‘Lollies Beat GST’, Northern Territory News, 16 March1993. 
Chapman, Judith D, (ed.). School-based decision-making and management. London: The Falmer Press, 1990. 
Clifton, Mark, and Smith, Alex (1990). Karama school representative council statement of purpose.Karama. 1990. 
Connell, R.W., et al., (1991) Making the difference: schools, families and social division. North Sydney. Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd., 1991. 
De Bono, Edward (1992). Teach your child how to think. London: Penguin Group. 
Donovan, Frances, and Jackson, Alun C. (1991). Managing human service organisations. New York: Prentice Hall Pty. Ltd., 1991. 
Duignan, Patrick A., ‘School-based decision-making and management: retrospect and prospect’, in Chapman, Judith D., (ed.), School-based decision-making and management. London. Falmer Press, 1990, pp. 327-345. 
Dwyer, Barry (1991). ‘What Parents Want’. In the Bulletin, Vol. 113, No. 5780, July 30, 1991, p.82. 
Fullan, Michael (1993). Change forces probing the depths of educational reform. London. Falmer Press. 
Fullan, Michael G., with Stiegelbauer, Susanne (1992). The new meaning of educational change.Second Edition, London. Cassell Educational Limited. 
Gray, Henry (1991). ‘Principal’s Report Prepared for Karama School Council Meeting’. November 20, 1991. 
Gray, Henry (1992). ‘Out of small acorns’ In Parent Quarterly Publication of the NT Council of Government School Organisations. Vol. 12, No. 3. Darwin. Australia. 
Gray, Henry (1992). ‘Student councils promote positive energy’. In the Suburban, 17 December 1992. 
Gray, Henry, ‘Student Representative Councils and Primary School Restructuring: A Paper Prepared for EDN 561 Managing Educational Environments – Restructuring Education, Semester One, 1993.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mr Henry Gray was at the time of writing, Principal of Leanyer School, in Darwin, in the Northern Territory, Australia. He has been involves in schools level educational leadership in Western Australia and the Northern Territory since 1971.
 

 Go to top of page      Go to online discussion

TEAM TEACHING AT ITS BEST The Cole – Bernardino Partnership

Gray – Team Teaching in the Northern Territory
Mr Henry Gray, Australia

This paper was published in February 2003.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mr Henry Gray is Principal of Leanyer School, in Darwin, in the Northern Territory, Australia. He can be contacted by email at: henrygray@bigpond.com

I have been around education since 1970 and a school principal in two Australian States and Territories for 30 of those years. During that time, I have worked in remote, rural, town and urban schools. It has been my privilege to have known thousands of students and to have worked with hundreds of teachers. No two students and no two teachers are identical. It’s the individuality of people that makes teaching and educational leadership so special.

For me, there have been plenty of high points and some that were low. There has been much to celebrate and heaps of challenges to contemplate. There have been countless educational initiatives to evaluate and teaching strategies to consider for possible benefit and potential pitfall. Part of the joy – and sometimes the frustration – of education, is that nothing ever stands still.

Team Teaching 
Over the years I have been presented, from time to time, with requests that I endorse a team teaching approach to educational delivery. Shared teaching strategies have both high and low points to consider. I’ve generally agreed to requests that teachers be allowed to team together for the purpose of educational delivery. This agreement has always been on condition that the teachers fully consult together on the notion within their units, with their senior teacher, and importantly, with parents of the children who are going to be taught by a teaching twosome.

It’s important to confess both a suspicion and a finding. In looking at teachers who team teach, it has always seemed that there is a disparity in terms of load sharing. It has always been apparent that one teacher puts in more of the underpinning foundational ‘hard yards’ than the other. And it has always seemed that the teacher who is ‘building’ the group, gets less credit and earns less recognition than his or her teaching partner. One seems to have the profile while the other more invisible, but ultimately more effective, teacher misses out on the recognition. Yet without the input of the less visible partner, the whole effort would crumble to nothingness.

In thinking about at least fifteen such arrangements over the years, it seems that this pattern has always fitted. Now, I’m not suggesting that one teaching partner has set out to earn the accolades and the praise for team teaching ventures, while setting the other to naught. Far from it. But in the eyes of the parents of the children and others observing from a little further back, it has often seemed that way. Maybe that has to do with some sort of preordained chemistry on which team teaching bonds are predicated and maybe it grows from the team ethos. But it has certainly happened in terms of my perceptions … until now, that is.

This Team is Different

 

 
 

Melanie Cole and Ana Bernardino are unlike teachers. Melanie Cole came to our school from Western Australia. She trained there and worked in regional remote areas, becoming a ‘top end’ West Australian pre-school coordinator.

She did lots of work in Aboriginal communities and was a ‘periodic visiting teacher’ developer of Assistant Teachers, as well as being an adviser to them and the members of the communities. Between visits to settlement pre-schools, she’d leave work for the on-site permanent assistants to undertake with children until her next visit. Melanie was both a teacher and a developer of teachers. She was a front runner in offering Aboriginal members of communities, a chance to become more responsible for the provision of educational services to their own people.

 

 

Melanie worked for a period with middle primary school students at Leanyer but then found her niche in Early Childhood.

Ana Bernardino trained as a teacher at the Northern Territory University. On graduation, she was appointed to Leanyer School, making a major contribution to our Early Childhood program. Ana has a lot of initiative. She absorbs new ideas and is able to develop them, in a wholly practical way, to meet the educational needs of our children. At one point in time, we asked Ana to work with teachers who had longer years of educational experience, in a developmental and mentorship role. Ana undertook this task so unobtrusively, yet so effectively, that those with whom she involved made significant advances. Together with Ana, they have become invaluable members of our school’s teaching team.

 

 

Ana is a teacher whose depth and breadth of educational experience attests hugely to the fact that she has worked in a quite extraordinary fashion toward self-betterment. Yet personal aggrandisement has been the least of her motivations. Her ‘getting on’ has been the outgrowth of her being there for others – children, parents and fellow teachers.

Transition in the Northern Territory 
It is necessary to explain that ‘Transition’ is an educational year or part-year that fits between pre-school (kindergarten) and Year One (Grade One) in Northern Territory schools. It’s a period when the rudiments of formal learning, including the exploration and development of ‘readiness’ for graduation into higher level learning are explored.

Children turning five years of age are entitled to enter the program. For the sake of organisation, intakes are not continual (happening the day children turn five), although this used to be the case. It works like this:

children turning five on or before the first day of the school year, start in Transition on Day 1 of Term 1;

children turning five between the start of the school year and Day 1 of   Term Two (around Easter) are entitled to begin Transition at the beginning of the term. They commence in Transition at the start of the eleventh week of  our 40-week school year;

children turning five between Day 1 of Term 2 and the commencement of Term 3 begin Transition on Day 1 of Term 3. That’s in late July;

children spend the year, nine months or six months in Transition, before moving to Year 1 at the start of the next school year; and,

some schools set up integrated (Transition/ Year One) programs for children who are still ‘bridging’. That can be the case for children who only have six months in a dedicated Transition group.

This continual movement requires principals to ensure that Transition teachers have quite extraordinary management skills. For the sake of a group that is constantly evolving, they need to be excellent at accommodating change and developing flexible, yet predictable, programs that meet the needs of individuals and the class collective. At Leanyer School, Ana Bernardino and Melanie Cole are teachers who fit that mould.

Philosophy and Methodology 
Ana and Melanie believe team teaching is an approach that helps create a positive, cooperative and harmonious learning environment. Through team teaching, they aim to build the self confidence of individuals. In writing about their program they said ‘we believe happy and reassured individuals have a greater potential to positively contribute to the class environment and their learning’.

Basis teaching methodologies are simple yet highly effective. Melanie and Ana have developed two working teams. Ana teachers the children who are working at a higher Transition level, while Melanie’s focus is on the group of children who need continuing repetition and learning consolidation. When these children have reached a stage where they are ready to further extend their knowledge, they move to Ana Bernardino’s working team, with new intakes of children going into Melanie Cole’s group.

For new intakes of children, the rudiments of Transition learning are applied, with Melanie working to further develop children continuing with her and who are not yet ready to graduate into Ana’s group.

Rewarding Application and Effort 
Positive reinforcement is a strategy underpinning the work Melanie and Ana do with children. They wrote that in Transition, ‘We do what we call ‘Legs. Look and Listen’ to target correct behaviour. Children are rewarded with counters, which are placed in their group’s container (this lives under the teacher’s chair). At the end of the week, we tally the counters. Children in the group earning the most counters, receive stickers, felt tip pens, erasers or other small rewards.

During Semester One, we introduce raffle tickets for ‘Safe and Happy Play’ in the playground. After relaxation time children sit on the mat to discuss with any problems they may have had at lunch. If there are any, they are dealt with straight away. Children who contribute to the discussion are given a raffle ticket on which they write their names.  Tickets are then placed in a bag. At the end of every second week, two names are drawn from the bag. Two children each receive a small gift.’

For Melanie and Ana, educational basics are ever so important. They hold high but achievable expectations for Transition children. Their focus is on English and mathematical development.

Expectations in English/Language 
‘Oral Interaction’, ‘Reading and Viewing’, ‘Writing’ and, importantly, ‘Listening’ are all areas of special focus.

Oral Interaction (Talking).

It is expected children will be able to:

speak English in order to interact with others in a school setting; and,

observe procedures, including turn-taking, and not interrupting others.

Reading and Viewing.

It is expected children will be able to:

predict written text through picture cues;

recognise upper and lower case letters;

borrow and return home books and library books;

begin to recognise common sight words;

recognise familiar words in their classroom environment; and,

independently choose books to read.

Writing.

It is expected children will be able to:

hold a pencil to write;

understand the orientation of writing – top to bottom, left to right;

understand that words have spaces between them;

copy words; and,

recognise full stops, capital letters and spacing.

Listening.

It is expected that children will be able to:

sit still, face and listen to others;

listen and follow two and three-step directions; and,

listen in a variety of situations, including group discussions, assemblies and performances, etc. to stories, and so on.

Phonological Awareness
Melanie and Ana’s English/Language program places great emphasis on phonological awareness, ‘the knowledge that words are composed of individual sounds and sound patterns and the ability of children to manipulate sounds and sound patterns by rhyming, blending, alliteration, repetition and comparison’.

In terms of phonological awareness, it is expected that children will be able to:

identify and name each of the letters of the alphabet;

identify most of the sounds that letters represent;

recognise initial and ending sounds in words; and,

begin to understand and recognise rhyming words.

Mathematical Expectations 
Ana and Melanie recognise and develop the three strands of the Mathematics Curriculum, which are ‘Space and Shape’, ‘Measurement’, and ‘Number’.

Space and Shape. 
It is expected that children will be able to:

understand and demonstrate positions, for example ‘under’, ‘over’, in’, ‘out’;
make constructions, paint or draw representations of familiar objects;
recognise familiar shapes – squares. circles, rectangles, triangles;
begin to understand patterning; and,
begin to understand symmetry.
Measurement. 
It is expected that children will be able to:

use blocks or other materials to investigate length and width;

use arbitrary units (cups, spoons, drops, handfuls) to measure volume and capacity;

compare mass through lifting, hefting or balancing; and,

recognise the time of day, days of the week, events of the day/week and annual events.

Number 
It is expected that children will be able to:

begin recognising ordinal numbers (1st – 10th);

begin sorting, grouping, matching and sharing;

recognise and write numbers 1 to 20; and,

begin to recognise coins and the values they represent.

There is so much more to the teaching and learning program happening for our Transition children. Linked to and underpinning the work going on, is the fact that both Ana Bernardino and Melanie Cole recognise and subscribe to the fundamentals, the foundational planks the precepts, the basics, upon which all learning should be predicated.

Why So Special?
A visit to Ana and Melanie’s teaching area convinces visitors that they are developing a strategy that really works. The tone and atmosphere in their double classroom is second to none. All their 60 plus children are working, always working productively, happily, to capacity and in a self ordered and disciplined manner. Children follow the basic conventions of posture, pencil hold and paper positioning when writing. They are polite, happily explaining to visitors what they are doing and why. Above all, they have a love for learning.

The class is not cloned. There are over sixty individuals, whose capacities, idiosyncrasies and needs are recognised and catered for by their teachers. This group of young children is different in that they are taught to recognise each other. They are not self centered uncaring individuals. They are a group whose recognition of and care for each other, translates to the fact that they are children going places in life’s world.

Through their approach to teaching, Ana and Melanie are reinforcing one of life’s forgotten needs – others count. Their selfless approach to teaching and the professional care they have for each other, is ‘rubbing off’ on the children fortunate enough to be in their learning group.

What Makes This a Real ‘Team’ Effort
It was hard to know why Ana and Melanie are such a successful team teaching couple. Successful they are but it took me ages to work out why they were ‘one of a kind’. Then the penny dropped. They are there for each other and for the children in their class. Many professionals – and teachers are not excluded – do what they do in order to impress. They are out there building the ‘curriculum vitae’. Benefits for others deriving from their efforts are almost accidental.

For Melanie Cole and Ana Bernadino, ‘group’ comes first ‘they’ come second and ‘I’ comes last. As teachers, it is ‘us’ and ‘we’ who are there for ‘them’. The ‘thems’ in this equation, Melanie and Ana’s 60-plus students are blessed to be working with such fine teachers.

Three Corollaries 
There are three corollaries.

The first is that in many team teaching situations, it seems that one teacher does most of the work while the other gets all the kudos. In this case, ‘equality’ applies to every aspect of the initiative. Both Melanie and Ana do the legwork both do the teaching, both share all responsibilities and both earn praise for being excellent teachers.

The second is that some team teaching couples exist for a very short time, before the initiative, for multivariate reasons, collapses. Ana and Melanie have developed a ‘three year plan’, whereby ‘planning’ builds into ‘application’ and application into ‘consolidated outcomes’. They have teamed for two years and there is one to go. Few team teachers commit to long-term team planning.

There is a third corollary. Melanie Cole and Ana Bernardino were both nominated for NEiTA (National Excellence in Teacher Awards) this year. Their nominees were the parents of children who recognise and appreciate them as great teachers.

Ana and Melanie are great teachers. We need to recognise the excellent teachers we have in our schools. It has been a joy to uphold these fine teachers and wonderful people to the educational world.